requestId:6852da200f6c38.71601030.
Lu Haibo in Thoughts History
Author: Haiyi
Source: “Random Online” February 23, 2023
Liu Haibo, born in 1969, from Shandong smoke station, is from Germuchaer Khan Fertilizer Factory in Qinghai Province. In 1988, he was admitted to the Department of Political Science in Beijing from Qinghai Province and was admitted to the bachelor’s, scholars and doctoral degree in Beijing. From 2001 to 2005, he taught in the Department of Political Science of the Chinese People’s Political Science, and later transferred to the Law Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. On February 19, 2023, he passed away in Beijing due to ineffective medical treatment. He has written a specialist “Preliminary Discussion on the Government”, published dozens of academic discussions and political discussions, and advocated the “self-forming system and building glory” of contemporary China, and strived to understand the great meaning of “new creation of old states” in the 20th century from the perspective of Chinese civilization.
Haiyu, Liu Haibobei’s major student, and a doctorate in politics.
In the early morning of February 19, 2023, Liu Haibo, a 53-year-old, ended his breathing. Not long ago, he just returned to the country to attend his father’s funeral.
Many people mourn his passing, but a unique phenomenon is that many people mention in their eulogy that they are inconsistent with Liu Haibo’s thinking, either “even if we have such disagreements, I still feel difficult for his past life” or “although I feel difficult for his past life, I still want to say that there is something between us平台”平台”平台”平台”平台”平台”平台”平台”平台”平台”平台”平台”平台”平台”平台. This phenomenon expresses Liu Haibo’s style: his thinking is a single tree, and when he comes to him, he often means discussion, and the need to go out of the comfort of his own thinking and receive a strange impact.
When approaching the end of his life, Liu Haibo had such a form of thinking: criticizing the sensibility, optimizing the thinking method of British common law, and sometimes using itDiscuss Hayek for sure verbal ethos (Friedrich August von Hayek), but the closer we get, the more we will criticize the capitalism; we will determine the modern Chinese “big sect” and Confucianism, hoping to rebuild the ethical career order of family ethics and communities under the market economic conditions, but we will also determine the modern existence of China. The problems of central royal rights must be governed by the political power and the “malignant capitalism” are difficult to eliminate the “historical cycle law” that governs the chaos. The “Yan’an System” formed in the 20th century responds to problems that have not been solved for two thousand years of Chinese history, and its appearance is 博博博 is the “super-to-people” within the Chinese civilization; however, although he determined the “Yan’an system”, he had no sense of international commonwealth, and did not value the specific reactionary fantasies believed in by the protesters of Yan’an, and even advocated “Max’s sacrificialization”, that is, he reduced his position from the “sacrificial” to the “sacrificial” position. The combination of these thought symbols brings a sense of rusty, which makes many people feel unsuitable. Therefore, many people think Liu Haibo is unreasonable. In the last decade of his life, his self-responsibility towards China has become increasingly mainstream in society, but his personal long-term career has been lonely.
How did Liu Haibo’s unique thinking form come about?
Liu Haibo was born in Shandong Furnishing Station in 1969. His grandfather’s family was Yin and had bought ships with several uncles to trade. As a result, he was wrapped in a military force in 1949 and separated from his family from his family on both sides of the sea shore for ten years. His grandmother nourished his father’s family at home. The Liu family’s land parcel was divided during the land reform, and was “family searched” during the Cultural Revolution. His grandmother and his father were looking for a future, so his father recruited workers to Germu, Qinghai and built a fat factory in Chalhan Salt Lake. Liu Haibo therefore obtained the ingredients of 口文化博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博博 therefore, he obtained the ingredients of 博博博博博博博He studied in a smoke station until his fourth grade, and went to Germu with his mother, finished elementary and middle school at the Shuhuo Factory, and was admitted to the major in Beijing’s major in politics in 1988.I have obtained bachelor’s degree, master’s degree and doctoral degree. From 2001 to 2005, he taught in the Department of Political Science of the Chinese People’s Political Science, and later became a postdoctoral fellow in the Law Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. He stayed in the institute for work and was an associate researcher at the institute when he was in the reign of the country.
The year when Liu Haibo entered the North was not unrelated. At that time, the young people who entered the school were never affected by serious historical events in their thinking. Some people have completely lost their faith in China and have moved to this shore. And young people like Liu Haibo are looking for China’s future in the midst of suffering. And turning your attention to the East彩彩 was still the purpose of the intellectual world at that time to find the foundation for the future. In the 99short-term maintenance, Liu Haibo also started with his reading of Hayek. Hayek neither recognized the socialist plan for economy nor the 20th century’s Cairns theory of improving capitalism. From the perspective of intellectual theory, planners have accurately grasped the knowledge and information of evacuation, which is most fundamentally unsatisfied in reality. The market exchanges, which are based on the foundation of individuals and the public property, have fought this dilemma and provided the foundation for the construction of the “self-growing order of self-growing club”. The Hayek area is divided into “constructive rationalism” and “evolutionary rationalism”, believing that the former will lead to slavery, while the latter will lead to an unrestrained order. In the discussion of the Chinese thinking circle in 1990s, “constructing sensualism” pointed to the development from the French reaction to the Russian reaction, and the latter’s order of operations was interpreted in 1991; “transforming sensualism” pointed to Britain and the United States, which won the cold war and laughed to the end.
Many years later, Liu Haibo abandoned many of Hayek’s views, but the impact of Hayek’s intellectual theory on him is still clear and identifiable. He never believed that the sensual evidence and design that developed from the first principles could set up useful orders, and he did not believe that the independent and emotional fantasy of “enlightenment” was self-reliance and use of emotional fantasy. He had a very sad attitude towards humanity, and believed that the emotional evidence and design of the first principle to perform the sensual view, passion and prejudice are vague. Many of Hayek’s praises are to use Hayek’s arguments to deny socialist approaches and systems, but Liu Haibo absorbed Hayek’s “constructional sentimentalism”The conclusion is that if a certain unrestrained fantasy is developed to design a system, or perhaps transplant a system from an oriental country to completely replace the current system, it is also a form of “constructing sensibility”. Reflecting on “constructing sensibility”, we must first realize that transformation must be based on the correctness of the existing order as a condition, which is Including a new order of birth from the 20th century reaction.
As a doctorate in politics, Liu Haibo failed to stay in Hayek’s intellectual theory and economic system, but must be concerned about the construction of the political system. Hayek’s “Decree, Legislation and Unrestricted” and “Theory of Unrestricted Order” provide a system’s political theory and political system theory. Short-term maintenance Liu Haibo and his colleagues used this as a crutch to find the popular laws and ruling in Britain. Their acceptance logic is like this: the European code tradition emphasizes the influence of legislators, so there is a deeply rooted constructive sentimentalism, and the popular laws in Britain are made up of the judgments made by judges. What is affected here is not the wisdom of a few legislators, but a tree standing on The evolutionary sentimentality above the foundation TC:
發佈留言